The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
To be fair, it's probably just Sony's lack of software expertise that caused this news report rather than the Cell processor, but if Sony are happy to launch a console knowing full well that 200 titles that are supposed to be backwards compatible aren't really working properly, what else haven't they told us?
> To be to absolutely fair, its got practically nothing to do with
> the Cell processor anyway, backward compatibility is handled
> elsewhere on the machine.
I concur, but I figured 'Parts of the PS3 Struggle with PSOne Game' didn't cut it as a snappy title with anti-Sony bias compared with the current trend of other snappy titles with anti-Sony bias like:
"PS3 forces us to get our game on in Japanese only"
"Boomerang Controller LIVES!"
"Big Problems for Sony PS3"
"PS3 Fails To Topple 360 Sales"
"Initial PS3 units plagued by software glitch"
"My PS3 Scratched in 3 Seconds"
"PS3 Media Playback: Complicated"
"PS3 May Not Live Up To Expectations"
which are all currently doing the rounds.
> To be fair, it's probably just Sony's lack of software expertise
> that caused this news report rather than the Cell processor, but
> if Sony are happy to launch a console knowing full well that 200
> titles that are supposed to be backwards compatible aren't really
> working properly, what else haven't they told us?
To be to absolutely fair, its got practically nothing to do with the Cell processor anyway, backward compatibility is handled elsewhere on the machine.
*With their own console
To be fair, it's probably just Sony's lack of software expertise that caused this news report rather than the Cell processor, but if Sony are happy to launch a console knowing full well that 200 titles that are supposed to be backwards compatible aren't really working properly, what else haven't they told us?