The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Just wondering:
1)What does 3:16 mean?
2)Where is X-Pac?
Does anybody know?
1)What does 3:16 mean?
2)Where is X-Pac?
Does anybody know?
Page:
ch3rrylips wrote:
> hiya does any1 have the walkthrough 4 this game plz cos im really
> stuck now
Yes. I have a walkthrough. Stand up. Turn your PC off. Walk out of the room.
Or, go to ukwalkthroughs.com. Wrong forum, btw.
> hiya does any1 have the walkthrough 4 this game plz cos im really
> stuck now
Yes. I have a walkthrough. Stand up. Turn your PC off. Walk out of the room.
Or, go to ukwalkthroughs.com. Wrong forum, btw.
hiya does any1 have the walkthrough 4 this game plz cos im really stuck now
O.k. one last thing on X-Pac and then I'll leave it go. Did anybody read the obituary he wrote for Curt Henning on PWTorch.com? It was a very well written piece, well thought out, moving, everything an obit should be. I made have my criticisms about Mr. Waltman but to voluntarily send that to PWTorch was a very classy thing to do.
As DW once said - YeY
I haven't got the time to reply so don't worry Lipey ;c)
Yes, moving on, cause if u carry on quoting each others WHOLE messages this will be madness!
If you don't wanna see daft posts, these forums really aren't for you.
DW wrote:
> "No plans to use him again" is something which I wouldn't
> class as being fired.
So what is your definition of getting fired from what is in effect an indy promotion with bells on?
But it doesn't matter
> how long you have been a fan. That's not what we're arguing here.
So the shot about me "probably being 11 yrs old" was just rough guess work from my writing style right? Not allusion to your belief that I knew less about wrestling than you do? Ok
> That's a start. I'm starting to like you, but only because I agree
> with you on the Shane McMahon/X-Pac feud. I can't actually remember
> that promo, but generally, X-Pac was good on the mic.
Well gee you liking me has made my day. Oh lordy lordy DW likes me! What am I to do?!!?! If you don't remember the promo it was this incredible
semi shoot about how X-Pac had returned "home" and how he had been held back in WCW (which is completely true), delivered with an unbelievable amount of passion. I actually put it on after I got off this thing earlier (God Bless you VCR) and it still manages to raise goose bumps on my arm.
> Fair point. But the nWo feud ruined his WWE career. Whether or not he
> was to let Booker get the win, his future in WWE wasn't looking
> bright.
Erm, but he deliberately held Booker back, the same thing he was so passionately against in said interview.
> And a 21 year old hurling their remote at the TV...not very mature is
> it. And on more then one occasion?
Ok, so that was a joke. Only A-Train matches actually make me do that. But what is it with you and my maturity? Do have a thing about younger people?
The people who turn up to WWE events don't want them in
> the ring. They boo and boo. Not because La Résistance are good
> heels...because they hate them. But that doesn't mean the wrestler/s
> don't have talent.
Never once have I said that X-Pac doesn't have talent. He does, bucketfulls of the stuff. My point is, if fans are booing you cause they hate you it kinda makes them not want to watch the t.v. shows that your on.
Yes. X-Pac threw it all away. He had everything going for him. But
> I don't think it's all over for him. >
I never said it was all over for him either. I just think it was very stupid of him to get himself into this position in the first place.
> Yeah. Just an opinion. Good talking to ya.
Pleasure's been all mine.
Look DW as far as I'm concerned I respect your opinion. You seem to have a great grasp on the business, and if your opinion differs from mine great. Debate is the sustenance of life and all that. But that "11 yr old" remark, that was just daft. Anyway, moving on .....
> "No plans to use him again" is something which I wouldn't
> class as being fired.
So what is your definition of getting fired from what is in effect an indy promotion with bells on?
But it doesn't matter
> how long you have been a fan. That's not what we're arguing here.
So the shot about me "probably being 11 yrs old" was just rough guess work from my writing style right? Not allusion to your belief that I knew less about wrestling than you do? Ok
> That's a start. I'm starting to like you, but only because I agree
> with you on the Shane McMahon/X-Pac feud. I can't actually remember
> that promo, but generally, X-Pac was good on the mic.
Well gee you liking me has made my day. Oh lordy lordy DW likes me! What am I to do?!!?! If you don't remember the promo it was this incredible
semi shoot about how X-Pac had returned "home" and how he had been held back in WCW (which is completely true), delivered with an unbelievable amount of passion. I actually put it on after I got off this thing earlier (God Bless you VCR) and it still manages to raise goose bumps on my arm.
> Fair point. But the nWo feud ruined his WWE career. Whether or not he
> was to let Booker get the win, his future in WWE wasn't looking
> bright.
Erm, but he deliberately held Booker back, the same thing he was so passionately against in said interview.
> And a 21 year old hurling their remote at the TV...not very mature is
> it. And on more then one occasion?
Ok, so that was a joke. Only A-Train matches actually make me do that. But what is it with you and my maturity? Do have a thing about younger people?
The people who turn up to WWE events don't want them in
> the ring. They boo and boo. Not because La Résistance are good
> heels...because they hate them. But that doesn't mean the wrestler/s
> don't have talent.
Never once have I said that X-Pac doesn't have talent. He does, bucketfulls of the stuff. My point is, if fans are booing you cause they hate you it kinda makes them not want to watch the t.v. shows that your on.
Yes. X-Pac threw it all away. He had everything going for him. But
> I don't think it's all over for him. >
I never said it was all over for him either. I just think it was very stupid of him to get himself into this position in the first place.
> Yeah. Just an opinion. Good talking to ya.
Pleasure's been all mine.
Look DW as far as I'm concerned I respect your opinion. You seem to have a great grasp on the business, and if your opinion differs from mine great. Debate is the sustenance of life and all that. But that "11 yr old" remark, that was just daft. Anyway, moving on .....
Halfcut Skeleton wrote:
> Actually it was stated by Jeremy Borash at an NWA:TNA press
> conference and relayed to almost every wrestling publication on both
> sides of the pacific. The words "no plans to use him again"
> were used.
"No plans to use him again" is something which I wouldn't class as being fired.
> As for my credentials I have been a wrestling fan for over fifteen
> years starting when my grandfather took me to watch an old school
> British Wrestling promotion when I was six (you know one of those
> deals where big fat guys put each other in head locks for ten minutes
> at a time). So you work out my age hot shot.
*Counts on fingers* 15 + 6...Let me just ask Figo what 15 + 6 is...
Yes, I worked it out by myself. 21? Right? Well you're lucky that you're grandfather took you to an event. I've been a wrestling fan for quite some time too, since I was 8 or 9. But it doesn't matter how long you have been a fan. That's not what we're arguing here.
> As for X-Pac, I actually agree with you DW. He was undoubtedly the
> best worker by far in DX. His fued with Shane McMahon over the now
> defunct European title was superb, as was his dramatic return to the
> WWF to start D-generation-x mk2 to begin with. During that segment he
> cut one of the best promo's it has ever been my good fortune to
> listen to.
That's a start. I'm starting to like you, but only because I agree with you on the Shane McMahon/X-Pac feud. I can't actually remember that promo, but generally, X-Pac was good on the mic.
> My problems with X-Pac are with his actions over the last two years
> or so. He meddled with the booking backstage, refused to lie down for
> Booker T during the N.W.O fued (something which is in any scenerio
> unforgiveable), and putting in such lazy performances in the ring
> that I physically hurled my remote a the t.v. or more than one
> occasion.
Fair point. But the nWo feud ruined his WWE career. Whether or not he was to let Booker get the win, his future in WWE wasn't looking bright. I don't think he was lazy in the ring...if he had been used right, I'm sure his performances would have been a better standard. And a 21 year old hurling their remote at the TV...not very mature is it. And on more then one occasion?
> Allegedly he turned up to work more than once in a state described as
> "unfit to perform", which if you know your wrestling
> cliches means he more than likely has a substance problem. And, most
> importantly, he gained genuine heat from fans. Not the "I'm
> going to boo you because your good at being a heel" heat. It was
> more like "we're going to boo you because we really don't want
> you to be in that ring" kind of heat. Which was probably the
> reason the WWE let him go.
Yeah, I understand that. But I also understand exactly why he was unfit to wrestle. WWE destroyed him, okay. What's the difference between booing someone because you think they are a good heel and booing someone because you don't want them to be in the ring. Only a true wrestling fan does that. Take Rene Dupree and Sylvian Grenier for example. The people who turn up to WWE events don't want them in the ring. They boo and boo. Not because La Résistance are good heels...because they hate them. But that doesn't mean the wrestler/s don't have talent.
> In my view (and I must state this is only my opinion so in the grand
> scheme of things it probably doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot)
> X-Pac IS a moron because he had it all, the career, the girl, the
> stroke, the talent, and he seems intent on throwing it all away. And
> anybody who does that I can whole heartedly respect.
Yes. X-Pac threw it all away. He had everything going for him. But don't think it's all over for him. He can still pick up the pieces and rebuild whatever he has left. He just needs to get fit again and work hard to get back to the top.
> But then hell, it's just an opinion.
Yeah. Just an opinion. Good talking to ya.
> Actually it was stated by Jeremy Borash at an NWA:TNA press
> conference and relayed to almost every wrestling publication on both
> sides of the pacific. The words "no plans to use him again"
> were used.
"No plans to use him again" is something which I wouldn't class as being fired.
> As for my credentials I have been a wrestling fan for over fifteen
> years starting when my grandfather took me to watch an old school
> British Wrestling promotion when I was six (you know one of those
> deals where big fat guys put each other in head locks for ten minutes
> at a time). So you work out my age hot shot.
*Counts on fingers* 15 + 6...Let me just ask Figo what 15 + 6 is...
Yes, I worked it out by myself. 21? Right? Well you're lucky that you're grandfather took you to an event. I've been a wrestling fan for quite some time too, since I was 8 or 9. But it doesn't matter how long you have been a fan. That's not what we're arguing here.
> As for X-Pac, I actually agree with you DW. He was undoubtedly the
> best worker by far in DX. His fued with Shane McMahon over the now
> defunct European title was superb, as was his dramatic return to the
> WWF to start D-generation-x mk2 to begin with. During that segment he
> cut one of the best promo's it has ever been my good fortune to
> listen to.
That's a start. I'm starting to like you, but only because I agree with you on the Shane McMahon/X-Pac feud. I can't actually remember that promo, but generally, X-Pac was good on the mic.
> My problems with X-Pac are with his actions over the last two years
> or so. He meddled with the booking backstage, refused to lie down for
> Booker T during the N.W.O fued (something which is in any scenerio
> unforgiveable), and putting in such lazy performances in the ring
> that I physically hurled my remote a the t.v. or more than one
> occasion.
Fair point. But the nWo feud ruined his WWE career. Whether or not he was to let Booker get the win, his future in WWE wasn't looking bright. I don't think he was lazy in the ring...if he had been used right, I'm sure his performances would have been a better standard. And a 21 year old hurling their remote at the TV...not very mature is it. And on more then one occasion?
> Allegedly he turned up to work more than once in a state described as
> "unfit to perform", which if you know your wrestling
> cliches means he more than likely has a substance problem. And, most
> importantly, he gained genuine heat from fans. Not the "I'm
> going to boo you because your good at being a heel" heat. It was
> more like "we're going to boo you because we really don't want
> you to be in that ring" kind of heat. Which was probably the
> reason the WWE let him go.
Yeah, I understand that. But I also understand exactly why he was unfit to wrestle. WWE destroyed him, okay. What's the difference between booing someone because you think they are a good heel and booing someone because you don't want them to be in the ring. Only a true wrestling fan does that. Take Rene Dupree and Sylvian Grenier for example. The people who turn up to WWE events don't want them in the ring. They boo and boo. Not because La Résistance are good heels...because they hate them. But that doesn't mean the wrestler/s don't have talent.
> In my view (and I must state this is only my opinion so in the grand
> scheme of things it probably doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot)
> X-Pac IS a moron because he had it all, the career, the girl, the
> stroke, the talent, and he seems intent on throwing it all away. And
> anybody who does that I can whole heartedly respect.
Yes. X-Pac threw it all away. He had everything going for him. But don't think it's all over for him. He can still pick up the pieces and rebuild whatever he has left. He just needs to get fit again and work hard to get back to the top.
> But then hell, it's just an opinion.
Yeah. Just an opinion. Good talking to ya.
DW wrote:
> Lipe wrote:
> X-Pac ruined DX! Damn him to hell!
>
> He ruined DX? HE RUINED DX? Nobody ruined DX; they were without a
> doubt the best faction going. And when they reunited, X-Pac was the
> best damn wrestler in DX.
I think it's too late to say....that I was......joking.
> Lipe wrote:
> X-Pac ruined DX! Damn him to hell!
>
> He ruined DX? HE RUINED DX? Nobody ruined DX; they were without a
> doubt the best faction going. And when they reunited, X-Pac was the
> best damn wrestler in DX.
I think it's too late to say....that I was......joking.
Page: