The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Hedfix wrote:
> I am Spartacus!
No I am Spartacus!
> I am Spartacus!
No I am Spartacus!
Page:
Hedfix wrote:
> I am Spartacus!
No I am Spartacus!
> I am Spartacus!
No I am Spartacus!
Rosalind wrote:
> Practical Magic wrote:
>
> I can of course offer no proof I was Belldandy
>
> Why not?
Well if you'd like to suggest something I could use to prove it then I'll try.
Congrats on becoming a notable BTW, kinda skipped the whole notable voting thing this time around as coursework beckoned.
> Practical Magic wrote:
>
> I can of course offer no proof I was Belldandy
>
> Why not?
Well if you'd like to suggest something I could use to prove it then I'll try.
Congrats on becoming a notable BTW, kinda skipped the whole notable voting thing this time around as coursework beckoned.
Goatboy wrote:
> Except everything you say as Belldandy or anyone else, by your own
> admittance, is not worth the neurons to read.
>
> Have a nice life
Oh I will, don't worry about it.
Hell, no one can say I didn't try eh ?
You going to post anything about Mr Moorecock's (is that the right spelling?)
Fahreneit 9/11 upcoming documentary film thing ?
I mean, you've got him, funded by Disney, saying he's going to link President Bush to Osama Bin Laden... no evidence at this stage like, but all the same the very fact Disney is sponsoring him for this suggests there may be something, either that of Disney just lined themselves up to take the biggest PR hit in history....
> Except everything you say as Belldandy or anyone else, by your own
> admittance, is not worth the neurons to read.
>
> Have a nice life
Oh I will, don't worry about it.
Hell, no one can say I didn't try eh ?
You going to post anything about Mr Moorecock's (is that the right spelling?)
Fahreneit 9/11 upcoming documentary film thing ?
I mean, you've got him, funded by Disney, saying he's going to link President Bush to Osama Bin Laden... no evidence at this stage like, but all the same the very fact Disney is sponsoring him for this suggests there may be something, either that of Disney just lined themselves up to take the biggest PR hit in history....
Practical Magic wrote:
> I mean, you've got him, funded by Disney, saying he's going to link
> President Bush to Osama Bin Laden... no evidence at this stage like,
> but all the same the very fact Disney is sponsoring him for this
> suggests there may be something, either that of Disney just lined
> themselves up to take the biggest PR hit in history....
--
And that's the best you can do?
An hilarious pun on a name you know?
*slow clap*
"The film will look at the alleged 'murky relationship' between Bush senior, controversial defence investment firm the Carlyle Group, and the bin Laden family. According to Moore, the former President had a business relationship with bin Laden's father, Mohammed, who left $300 million to his son.Although the bin Laden family has severed its ties with Osama, 'the senior Bush kept his ties with the bin Laden family up until two months after 11 September,' Moore claimed
---
Your debating skills are as valid as your existence.
No links to Bush & Bin Laden you say? "no evidence at this stage like"
http://www.americanfreedomnews.com/afn_articles/ bushsecrets.htm
http://www.rediff.com/us/2001/nov/07ny5.htm
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Mahfouz.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/INL110A.html
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0109/S00108.htm
http://www.tehelka.com/channels/currentaffairs/ 2001/nov/21/ca112101america.htm
http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd01312003.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/events/ newsnight/1645527.stm
http://old.smh.com.au/news/0111/07/world/world100.html
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/ 09_18_01_bushbin.html
---
Those are just the 1st few that pop up on google, altavista, lycos etc.
Honestly Kissinger, know what you're talking about otherwise, yet again, you fall on your ass.
That's why you're an object of ridicule Bell, not because of your views (that you are prone to change on a whim), but your absolute lack of understanding of the opposition's ideas.
And you cannot seriously debate somebody unless you know what they mean, otherwise it's just red-faced repetition of your own versions, lacking the foresight and intelligence to have a check on what the other person believes.
Which is why you cant talk about Chomsky, Moore, Mark Thomas, The Guardian or even the difference between "pacifist" and "anti-war".
Because you're too stupid to.
Gnight sweetie
> I mean, you've got him, funded by Disney, saying he's going to link
> President Bush to Osama Bin Laden... no evidence at this stage like,
> but all the same the very fact Disney is sponsoring him for this
> suggests there may be something, either that of Disney just lined
> themselves up to take the biggest PR hit in history....
--
And that's the best you can do?
An hilarious pun on a name you know?
*slow clap*
"The film will look at the alleged 'murky relationship' between Bush senior, controversial defence investment firm the Carlyle Group, and the bin Laden family. According to Moore, the former President had a business relationship with bin Laden's father, Mohammed, who left $300 million to his son.Although the bin Laden family has severed its ties with Osama, 'the senior Bush kept his ties with the bin Laden family up until two months after 11 September,' Moore claimed
---
Your debating skills are as valid as your existence.
No links to Bush & Bin Laden you say? "no evidence at this stage like"
http://www.americanfreedomnews.com/afn_articles/ bushsecrets.htm
http://www.rediff.com/us/2001/nov/07ny5.htm
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Mahfouz.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/INL110A.html
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0109/S00108.htm
http://www.tehelka.com/channels/currentaffairs/ 2001/nov/21/ca112101america.htm
http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd01312003.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/events/ newsnight/1645527.stm
http://old.smh.com.au/news/0111/07/world/world100.html
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/ 09_18_01_bushbin.html
---
Those are just the 1st few that pop up on google, altavista, lycos etc.
Honestly Kissinger, know what you're talking about otherwise, yet again, you fall on your ass.
That's why you're an object of ridicule Bell, not because of your views (that you are prone to change on a whim), but your absolute lack of understanding of the opposition's ideas.
And you cannot seriously debate somebody unless you know what they mean, otherwise it's just red-faced repetition of your own versions, lacking the foresight and intelligence to have a check on what the other person believes.
Which is why you cant talk about Chomsky, Moore, Mark Thomas, The Guardian or even the difference between "pacifist" and "anti-war".
Because you're too stupid to.
Gnight sweetie
*eyes stopwatch*
C'mon Kissinger, you can read those links quicker than that.
Run Belldandy, run!!
Y'know, for someone that posted only this morning how much you didnt care for what was written here, you sure do get yo panties in a bunch real easy.
*pats his quivering little angry head*
Goatboy - Fishing for 'tards since The Net was invented
C'mon Kissinger, you can read those links quicker than that.
Run Belldandy, run!!
Y'know, for someone that posted only this morning how much you didnt care for what was written here, you sure do get yo panties in a bunch real easy.
*pats his quivering little angry head*
Goatboy - Fishing for 'tards since The Net was invented
Goatboy wrote:
> *pats his quivering little angry head*
> *pats his quivering little angry head*
Practical Magic wrote:
> Well if you'd like to suggest something I could use to prove it then
> I'll try.
Use the Belldandy account (and hence username) to confirm.
I don't know what to believe any more.
I think I almost don't care. Almost. It'd still be nice to know who's who.
> Well if you'd like to suggest something I could use to prove it then
> I'll try.
Use the Belldandy account (and hence username) to confirm.
I don't know what to believe any more.
I think I almost don't care. Almost. It'd still be nice to know who's who.
Practical Magic wrote:
> Rosalind wrote:
> Practical Magic wrote:
>
> I can of course offer no proof I was Belldandy
>
> Why not?
>
> Well if you'd like to suggest something I could use to prove it then
> I'll try.
>
> Congrats on becoming a notable BTW, kinda skipped the whole notable
> voting thing this time around as coursework beckoned.
Um, Thanks for that.
Couldn't you just post as your Belldandy user name confirming that you are who you say you are?
With the stuff thats going off around here I don't know who is who anymore, and I hate distrusting people, but I also hate being taken for some sort of niave fool.
> Rosalind wrote:
> Practical Magic wrote:
>
> I can of course offer no proof I was Belldandy
>
> Why not?
>
> Well if you'd like to suggest something I could use to prove it then
> I'll try.
>
> Congrats on becoming a notable BTW, kinda skipped the whole notable
> voting thing this time around as coursework beckoned.
Um, Thanks for that.
Couldn't you just post as your Belldandy user name confirming that you are who you say you are?
With the stuff thats going off around here I don't know who is who anymore, and I hate distrusting people, but I also hate being taken for some sort of niave fool.
Rosalind wrote:
> Couldn't you just post as your Belldandy user name confirming that you
> are who you say you are?
What a good idea :^P
> Couldn't you just post as your Belldandy user name confirming that you
> are who you say you are?
What a good idea :^P
Rosalind wrote:
> I also hate being taken
> for some sort of niave fool.
(Ironic that you spelt naive wrong, then)
:)
> I also hate being taken
> for some sort of niave fool.
(Ironic that you spelt naive wrong, then)
:)
Page: