The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://xbox.ign.com/articles/632/632351p1.html[/URL]
Sold Fable a long time ago and have been really wanting to play it again, so i can't wait for this.
Oh and can I be the first to say STFU Cycloon!!11!1
Sold Fable a long time ago and have been really wanting to play it again, so i can't wait for this.
Oh and can I be the first to say STFU Cycloon!!11!1
Page:
If they put in some difficulty settings that actually make it a challenge then I'll get it straight away.
It had it's problems and wasn't the game Molyneux hyped it up to be. But despite its faults I still loved the game and I'm anxious to get back to Albion. Especially now there's new areas, weapons, enemies and stuff.
Oh definitely, but his work just ends up a little sub-standard. Yeah, I admire him for trying, but he just doesn't have the talent of, oooh, let's say Shigeru Miyamoto, who, in basically all cases, pulls it off exceptionally. Peter M also runs his mouth quite a while before the game's release, mentioning all these incredible features, only delivering like 40% of them.
gimo80 wrote:
> All of that bloke's work is far too ambitious. He always, in every
> case, fails to deliver the complete experience.
Well someone in the industry needs to try and push the envelope. Otherwise we'll just end up playing FIFA 2010, Tony Hawks 93 and NFS 123.
> All of that bloke's work is far too ambitious. He always, in every
> case, fails to deliver the complete experience.
Well someone in the industry needs to try and push the envelope. Otherwise we'll just end up playing FIFA 2010, Tony Hawks 93 and NFS 123.
I liked it. Shall be getting this.
gimo80 wrote:
> Well Fable wasn't that good in the first place
It didn't quite meet my expectation, but it was fun to play nevertheless. OK, it was a little ambitious, but haven't you ever failed by just trying out some ambitions?
> Well Fable wasn't that good in the first place
It didn't quite meet my expectation, but it was fun to play nevertheless. OK, it was a little ambitious, but haven't you ever failed by just trying out some ambitions?
Well Fable wasn't that good in the first place, so why this is happening is beyond me. I think that Peter Molyneux (sp?) bloke should shut his trap in the meantime, and create a worthy follow up to the highly ambitious series.
All of that bloke's work is far too ambitious. He always, in every case, fails to deliver the complete experience.
All of that bloke's work is far too ambitious. He always, in every case, fails to deliver the complete experience.
Why pay for it again? I'm wondering why they didn't just put all this content into Fable 2. I mean, it should take place in Albion anyway. I suppose if I want to play it I'll just part exchange my original Fable for it.
I was just about to get Fable too. According to IGN 'The Lost Chapters' is the entire original game with extra content added in, so guess I'll wait for it to be released rather than get Fable now.
Should think its an expansion pack, because they're just adding new things on...
Page: