The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/08/30/news_6132290.html[/URL]
For what appears to be an EA trick of screwing developers and taking the franchise in-house to save money and increase revenue.
Which would explain why the ever increasing Medal of Honour games decrease with quality each time.
For what appears to be an EA trick of screwing developers and taking the franchise in-house to save money and increase revenue.
Which would explain why the ever increasing Medal of Honour games decrease with quality each time.
Page:
[URL]http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/08/30/news_6132290.html[/URL]
For what appears to be an EA trick of screwing developers and taking the franchise in-house to save money and increase revenue.
Which would explain why the ever increasing Medal of Honour games decrease with quality each time.
For what appears to be an EA trick of screwing developers and taking the franchise in-house to save money and increase revenue.
Which would explain why the ever increasing Medal of Honour games decrease with quality each time.
To be honest I've never even heard "Spark" mentioned. Is it the new name of an existing company?
Gearbox mabye?
*Goes to check IGN*
Nope it comes up as 'developer: spark unlimited'.
*Goes to check IGN*
Nope it comes up as 'developer: spark unlimited'.
Gearbox was BiA's?
Call of Duty: Finest Hour, not Brothers in Arms.
Do you people even read articles or just skim?
Do you people even read articles or just skim?
Goatboy wrote:
> Which would explain why the ever increasing Medal of Honour games
> decrease with quality each time.
I always thought Frontline was the single worst MoH game ever... Stragely enough, the MoH games on consoles actually got BETTER each time. Although they're still complete pap. CoD games on the PC were amazingly good... I sincerely hope Spark win the case and keep the CoD franchise. Get it out with a decent publisher. MGS, maybe.
> Which would explain why the ever increasing Medal of Honour games
> decrease with quality each time.
I always thought Frontline was the single worst MoH game ever... Stragely enough, the MoH games on consoles actually got BETTER each time. Although they're still complete pap. CoD games on the PC were amazingly good... I sincerely hope Spark win the case and keep the CoD franchise. Get it out with a decent publisher. MGS, maybe.
Goatboy wrote:
> Call of Duty: Finest Hour, not Brothers in Arms.
> Do you people even read articles or just skim?
Skim, mainly because I couldn't give a rats ass.
I think the point Hedfix was trying to make was that Spark and Gearbox were the same company or division of the same company.
> Call of Duty: Finest Hour, not Brothers in Arms.
> Do you people even read articles or just skim?
Skim, mainly because I couldn't give a rats ass.
I think the point Hedfix was trying to make was that Spark and Gearbox were the same company or division of the same company.
Game wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> Which would explain why the ever increasing Medal of Honour games
> decrease with quality each time.
>
> I always thought Frontline was the single worst MoH game ever...
> Stragely enough, the MoH games on consoles actually got BETTER each
> time. Although they're still complete pap. CoD games on the PC were
> amazingly good... I sincerely hope Spark win the case and keep the
> CoD franchise. Get it out with a decent publisher. MGS, maybe.
MoH has always been crap, although there were moments in Frontline which I enjoyed. CoD had a great multiplayer aspect for the PC which helped, the people that designed the maps for the online play are legends.
> Goatboy wrote:
> Which would explain why the ever increasing Medal of Honour games
> decrease with quality each time.
>
> I always thought Frontline was the single worst MoH game ever...
> Stragely enough, the MoH games on consoles actually got BETTER each
> time. Although they're still complete pap. CoD games on the PC were
> amazingly good... I sincerely hope Spark win the case and keep the
> CoD franchise. Get it out with a decent publisher. MGS, maybe.
MoH has always been crap, although there were moments in Frontline which I enjoyed. CoD had a great multiplayer aspect for the PC which helped, the people that designed the maps for the online play are legends.
MOHAA was a good game, with some great set pieces and a fantastic Omaha Beach level. There were some weak moments, and it doesn't stand up too well to CoD, but it's certainly not a bad game by any means.
OddToe wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
> Call of Duty: Finest Hour, not Brothers in Arms.
> Do you people even read articles or just skim?
>
> Skim, mainly because I couldn't give a rats ass.
>
> I think the point Hedfix was trying to make was that Spark and
> Gearbox were the same company or division of the same company.
Were they? That was my guess.
And yes I read the whole article from top to bottom before any guesswork thankyou very much. :P
> Goatboy wrote:
> Call of Duty: Finest Hour, not Brothers in Arms.
> Do you people even read articles or just skim?
>
> Skim, mainly because I couldn't give a rats ass.
>
> I think the point Hedfix was trying to make was that Spark and
> Gearbox were the same company or division of the same company.
Were they? That was my guess.
And yes I read the whole article from top to bottom before any guesswork thankyou very much. :P
Page: