The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Doom 3'.
Doom3's on rails (almost) shooter, (still) increible graphics, a sub Half Life 2 grav gun (It's the same, but limited by the environment, that's why it times out. Don't argue) and a sub Max Payne 2 Bullet time. Throw in some simple and annoying puzzles (a bit of a step up from the first admittedly) and you have......
A totally underwealming experience.
Poor.
Worth it for the enemies with the computer screen mouths alone. I'm glad I picked this up for a fiver....
I'll hand over to Chip now, for his usual, and predictable reply of "Hl2 sucked, Doom3 was a far better game" ;P
A totally underwealming experience.
Poor.
Worth it for the enemies with the computer screen mouths alone. I'm glad I picked this up for a fiver....
I'll hand over to Chip now, for his usual, and predictable reply of "Hl2 sucked, Doom3 was a far better game" ;P
Well, if it's been done right, then it should be good.
There isn't co-op for ROE but a mod has just been finished giving Doom 3 a co-op mode thats now fully working.
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> 8 player deathmatches though, right?
>
> *Shrug* I played D3 deathmatch all of about 3 times. It's the single
> player experience I was interested in seeing, to find out if any of
> the shortcomings were corrected. Nope, just more added.
Does ROE throw in some co-op action then?
That truly does rule.
Nice thing about the death match was it seemed very faithful to the originals game's approach.
> Hedfix wrote:
> 8 player deathmatches though, right?
>
> *Shrug* I played D3 deathmatch all of about 3 times. It's the single
> player experience I was interested in seeing, to find out if any of
> the shortcomings were corrected. Nope, just more added.
Does ROE throw in some co-op action then?
That truly does rule.
Nice thing about the death match was it seemed very faithful to the originals game's approach.
For my views on doom 3: ROE [URL]http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/display_messages.php?threadid=122440&forumid=422[/URL]
I wasn't that keen on HL2. Sure it looked great and the physics were fun, but as a game it got dull and repetitive.
Hedfix wrote:
> 8 player deathmatches though, right?
*Shrug* I played D3 deathmatch all of about 3 times. It's the single player experience I was interested in seeing, to find out if any of the shortcomings were corrected. Nope, just more added.
> 8 player deathmatches though, right?
*Shrug* I played D3 deathmatch all of about 3 times. It's the single player experience I was interested in seeing, to find out if any of the shortcomings were corrected. Nope, just more added.
Hey i never compare games like that, HL2 sucked on it's own merits doom 3 was nothing to do with it.
8 player deathmatches though, right?
Doom3's on rails (almost) shooter, (still) increible graphics, a sub Half Life 2 grav gun (It's the same, but limited by the environment, that's why it times out. Don't argue) and a sub Max Payne 2 Bullet time. Throw in some simple and annoying puzzles (a bit of a step up from the first admittedly) and you have......
A totally underwealming experience.
Poor.
Worth it for the enemies with the computer screen mouths alone. I'm glad I picked this up for a fiver....
I'll hand over to Chip now, for his usual, and predictable reply of "Hl2 sucked, Doom3 was a far better game" ;P
A totally underwealming experience.
Poor.
Worth it for the enemies with the computer screen mouths alone. I'm glad I picked this up for a fiver....
I'll hand over to Chip now, for his usual, and predictable reply of "Hl2 sucked, Doom3 was a far better game" ;P