GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"What video gaming needs........."

The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Mon 02/12/02 at 21:49
Regular
Posts: 787
Recently I have been thinking, What makes a 'classic' a 'classic'? What makes games like GTA3, Halo and Mario such killer games? Iventivity? Yes, but also development within a certain genre. Games like Pikmin prove how new, inventive games can be a new experience to gamers while being successful and fun to play, these games are the 'originals'. In the future there will be new games, a new experience to new gamers, but looking back we would be able to see where the inspiration came from. Much like today. Retro gamers would be able to see the development of games like Halo throughout the years. Please continue to read..

When someone operates outside of these sorts of clichés and decides to model a game after their own conception of fun we sometimes end up with renowned, genre defining titles like Resident Evil, Virtua Fighter and the Command & Conquer series. Yet all of these titles are perched at the top of a long list of cascading clones and spin-off genres that quickly turn their originality into annoying regulars.

While Resident Evil was not the first of it’s kind, through marketing and appealing game play it became the standard and encouraged the birth of crappy copies like Carrier and inventive titles like Silent Hill. In the case of Silent Hill, the clichés were taken, acknowledged, manipulated and splintered into a respectfully inspired product. On the other hand, what “Doom” was to the “Halo” - a bastardization of all that made the original as notable as it was.

In recent times titles like Final Fantasy X and Grand Theft Auto III have reformed, to some extent, what we expect from a game for better or worse. Grand Theft Auto III has all but ruined me for urban action/driving titles that lack the same scope of freedom and elbowroom. Accordingly, Final Fantasy X has driven the commercial stake that much deeper into the heart of the genre (and gaming as a whole) and formed something less like an RPG and more like an interactive blockbuster film with an extreme emphasis on graphics and a healthy helping of everything we already seen before - giving the people what they seem to want.

Ultimately the industry benefits from the progression caused by these evolving games but far too often good games capable of dissolving clichés are largely overlooked and never revisited because of their lack of profit. It’s a shame to see games like Out of this World (SNES), Fade to Black (PS) and about 1/3 of the late Dreamcast’s line up being so disregarded but my favorite example is Shadowrun for SNES. It took a gritty, futuristic street setting and turned it into a strategy/RPG/action game that involved infiltrating corporations, local gangs and complex computer systems. Based on a story from the popular Shadowrun sci-fi technology series it had a novel storyline and an interesting concept akin to movies like the Matrix or Blade Runner. It would be great to see more cliché breaking titles of this sort on the new generation of hardware but content is seemingly being buried underneath the glamorous graphics of the times.

In these times of such commercialism it’s hard to say who has the leading influence on the gaming industry’s direction - the gamers, the marketers, individual developers or the community of developers as a whole. Considering this, it’s clear that the entire system works like a web with each segment in some way manipulating another - we want to play the games we like but where do you draw the line. If developers are so concerned about us when they create games aren’t we bound to play the same thing over and over simply because we keep buying it? Does a development team ever get to realize their own vision and nix the proven clichés if their spectators are looking over their shoulder and into their minds while they’re working? Can creativity ever prevail if their minds are on their money and their money’s on their minds?

Yes. We sit on our couches and armchairs at the threshold of what is hopefully a new era of gaming. Along with new hardware capabilities should come the unbridled potential for new gaming concepts. Hopefully as more independent developers get their wings and the market stream widens to fit three major consoles, the competitive spirit of the days before Playstation will return somewhat. In such a crowded market, you can’t possibly sustain an upwardly moving economy with careless uniformity of concepts and design - original content becomes the ace up the corporate sleeve. With that said, let’s hope these are the bloodiest console wars since the advent of gaming.

That Is the longest post I have ever typed, please read as I have spent a lot of time creating this. Thank you.

Sam41
Tue 03/12/02 at 07:04
Posts: 0
Mate ill refrain from using yours if you don't abuse mine!! fair deal sam 41
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:22
Posts: 0
Cheers mate
I was going to ask him to do the same


Sam41
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:18
Regular
Posts: 181
Rafiki,

Please refrain from using these messages boards.

Thank you.



Love up_in_smoke :P
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:07
Posts: 0
Mate chill out nerd i may be a jerk but at least i have a sense of humour i may post some silly messages but its fun ok. i will start posting my full on views tommorrow where u will see long subject topics!!!!

lighten up dude
rafiki

sum 41 are hardcore punk man!!!!!!
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:04
Posts: 0
Hey, I hate to ruin your little popularity contest here, but did you not detect any sarcasm in your topic? Not one tiny little bit? This is a genuine post, one that contains thought and originality, but when i see a post like yours:

"Avril Lavigne - Xbox Game!!!!"

It makes me annoyed to see this. A forum where people come to discuss Gaming and display their thoughts. But then we have Jerks like you, making cruddy topics wasting everyones time. So what if my topic is long, at least it has meaning.

Thanks anyway, Jerk

Sam41
Mon 02/12/02 at 21:58
Posts: 0
In my opinion what video computer games really need are New ideas and not somebody who copy's other peoples idea for the band Sum 41!! some silly person on the special resverve message board has copied but changed to sam 41 and can we really belive that wot he just wrote is his own work!!

Please read this for i have spent 1 minute writing it thankyou for your patients

Love Rafiki
Mon 02/12/02 at 21:51
Posts: 0
mate who cares can't be botherd to read it all good idea tyring 2 win that game but sorry they love me unlucky better luck next time

luv rafiki
Mon 02/12/02 at 21:49
Posts: 0
Recently I have been thinking, What makes a 'classic' a 'classic'? What makes games like GTA3, Halo and Mario such killer games? Iventivity? Yes, but also development within a certain genre. Games like Pikmin prove how new, inventive games can be a new experience to gamers while being successful and fun to play, these games are the 'originals'. In the future there will be new games, a new experience to new gamers, but looking back we would be able to see where the inspiration came from. Much like today. Retro gamers would be able to see the development of games like Halo throughout the years. Please continue to read..

When someone operates outside of these sorts of clichés and decides to model a game after their own conception of fun we sometimes end up with renowned, genre defining titles like Resident Evil, Virtua Fighter and the Command & Conquer series. Yet all of these titles are perched at the top of a long list of cascading clones and spin-off genres that quickly turn their originality into annoying regulars.

While Resident Evil was not the first of it’s kind, through marketing and appealing game play it became the standard and encouraged the birth of crappy copies like Carrier and inventive titles like Silent Hill. In the case of Silent Hill, the clichés were taken, acknowledged, manipulated and splintered into a respectfully inspired product. On the other hand, what “Doom” was to the “Halo” - a bastardization of all that made the original as notable as it was.

In recent times titles like Final Fantasy X and Grand Theft Auto III have reformed, to some extent, what we expect from a game for better or worse. Grand Theft Auto III has all but ruined me for urban action/driving titles that lack the same scope of freedom and elbowroom. Accordingly, Final Fantasy X has driven the commercial stake that much deeper into the heart of the genre (and gaming as a whole) and formed something less like an RPG and more like an interactive blockbuster film with an extreme emphasis on graphics and a healthy helping of everything we already seen before - giving the people what they seem to want.

Ultimately the industry benefits from the progression caused by these evolving games but far too often good games capable of dissolving clichés are largely overlooked and never revisited because of their lack of profit. It’s a shame to see games like Out of this World (SNES), Fade to Black (PS) and about 1/3 of the late Dreamcast’s line up being so disregarded but my favorite example is Shadowrun for SNES. It took a gritty, futuristic street setting and turned it into a strategy/RPG/action game that involved infiltrating corporations, local gangs and complex computer systems. Based on a story from the popular Shadowrun sci-fi technology series it had a novel storyline and an interesting concept akin to movies like the Matrix or Blade Runner. It would be great to see more cliché breaking titles of this sort on the new generation of hardware but content is seemingly being buried underneath the glamorous graphics of the times.

In these times of such commercialism it’s hard to say who has the leading influence on the gaming industry’s direction - the gamers, the marketers, individual developers or the community of developers as a whole. Considering this, it’s clear that the entire system works like a web with each segment in some way manipulating another - we want to play the games we like but where do you draw the line. If developers are so concerned about us when they create games aren’t we bound to play the same thing over and over simply because we keep buying it? Does a development team ever get to realize their own vision and nix the proven clichés if their spectators are looking over their shoulder and into their minds while they’re working? Can creativity ever prevail if their minds are on their money and their money’s on their minds?

Yes. We sit on our couches and armchairs at the threshold of what is hopefully a new era of gaming. Along with new hardware capabilities should come the unbridled potential for new gaming concepts. Hopefully as more independent developers get their wings and the market stream widens to fit three major consoles, the competitive spirit of the days before Playstation will return somewhat. In such a crowded market, you can’t possibly sustain an upwardly moving economy with careless uniformity of concepts and design - original content becomes the ace up the corporate sleeve. With that said, let’s hope these are the bloodiest console wars since the advent of gaming.

That Is the longest post I have ever typed, please read as I have spent a lot of time creating this. Thank you.

Sam41

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Just a quick note to say thanks for a very good service ... in fact excellent service..
I am very happy with your customer service and speed and quality of my broadband connection .. keep up the good work . and a good new year to all of you at freeola.
Matthew Bradley
Many thanks!!
Registered my website with Freeola Sites on Tuesday. Now have full and comprehensive Google coverage for my site. Great stuff!!
John Shepherd

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre
Feedback Close Feedback

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.