The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The documentary shows images of the crash that happened almost 10 years ago. Although the actual images of those involved have been removed but I'd imagine you could work out what's been removed from the pictures.
For me this story just shows the state of journalism/news in this country. We have photographers following any kind of celeb looking to catch them doing something out of character - be it fighting, drinking or falling out of their dress. A sad state when pictures of people dying in a nasty accident become 'entertainment'.
To me it seems that channel 4 are using all this as a bit more publicity for the documentary. I'd imagine the whole documentary will be quite lame compared to the amount of press that it is currently getting. It's the public interest part that gets to me.
Is anyone actually interested in seeing the images?
I know Diana was a high profile public figure, but does anyone really think that her death still deserves to be reported on like this so after her death? Preserving her memory is fine with me but I'd quite happily see the majority of news about her laid to rest.
Are the general public really that nosey that they'll lap up this documentary and want to see similar stuff? (the amount of crappy celeb mags out there tells me this could be quite true)
So who wants to see these images? and why?
The documentary shows images of the crash that happened almost 10 years ago. Although the actual images of those involved have been removed but I'd imagine you could work out what's been removed from the pictures.
For me this story just shows the state of journalism/news in this country. We have photographers following any kind of celeb looking to catch them doing something out of character - be it fighting, drinking or falling out of their dress. A sad state when pictures of people dying in a nasty accident become 'entertainment'.
To me it seems that channel 4 are using all this as a bit more publicity for the documentary. I'd imagine the whole documentary will be quite lame compared to the amount of press that it is currently getting. It's the public interest part that gets to me.
Is anyone actually interested in seeing the images?
I know Diana was a high profile public figure, but does anyone really think that her death still deserves to be reported on like this so after her death? Preserving her memory is fine with me but I'd quite happily see the majority of news about her laid to rest.
Are the general public really that nosey that they'll lap up this documentary and want to see similar stuff? (the amount of crappy celeb mags out there tells me this could be quite true)
So who wants to see these images? and why?
Why do people want to know this sort of thing? I don't know, as none of it seems at all interesting, and indeed seems to only serve the purpose of selling cheap, dumb magazines to equally dumb people, who want to know how the other half live due to their own ambitions or possibly lack of any substance in their own lives.
The public interest? As far as I'm concerned, it should be to show some decent programming instead of rehashing a such a tragedy again, again and again, usually at the same angle of reporting.
Will I be watching this? No. I'll probably do something worthwhile, like continue revising for my A-Levels, or tune into Men & Motors to watch police chases, because let's face it, that is actually more tasteful! Want to preserve Diana's memory? How about something on her charity work?
I do.
- and why?
Oh, nothing more than morbid voyeurism. I'd like to see all the Royals dead.
> - So who wants to see these images?
> I do.
> - and why?
> Oh, nothing more than morbid voyeurism. I'd like to see all the
> Royals dead.
Well, there you have it.
Personally, I don't care to see the pictures. I genuinely admired the gal for her humanity and altruism, which made her more valuable to the commoner than any of those Royals put together. She's gone now.. a misfortune for us all. Sometimes I wonder if Prince Charles had her taken out, but whatever.. With all the grief the world endured in her passing, I just as well consider the incident to have been an accident caused by a drunken chauffer and let her rest in peace.
Even in her short time here with us, she truly made a difference in our lives with her stature, opening our eyes to the suffering of people in less fortunate countries and to grave causes that needed our immediate attention. She inspired others seek out to help others too.
I believe the majority of people are asking why these pictures would surface now and leaning more towards all of it to be just another publicity stunt. It's just shameful and disrespectful to her memory, because being the focus of the public eye is not all Diana was about. It would be more respectable to concentrate on publicising her work.
I didn't - just wondered if there was actually a point to the documentary or if it was the same old story as always.
Still, if the Royals want to crown British society and continue to leech off the populus, then they shouldn't be surprised if there is over-interest in every aspect of their lives (and deaths).
I was watching Sky News on... Friday? There was a Conservative MP on the show reviewing the next day headlines, and I think the Daily Mail or the Express was printing a Diana headline; he basically said that it was all wholly unneccessary, and all it does is give them a 5% sales boost every now and then by printing such twaddle, and at the same time undermine their credibility.
It's just Channel 4 trying to get viewers and I don't think it should have been shown.