The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
On the subject of First person shooters, which one do you prefer?
Games like the Rainbow Six series uses Real life situations, Black Hawk down aswell as Battlefield 1942 and vietcong.
Fantasy First person shooters are like half life, ureal 1 + 2 and unreal tournament/2003
You can tell the difference between them by the levels they are set on and the weapons in the games.
Games like the Rainbow Six series uses Real life situations, Black Hawk down aswell as Battlefield 1942 and vietcong.
Fantasy First person shooters are like half life, ureal 1 + 2 and unreal tournament/2003
You can tell the difference between them by the levels they are set on and the weapons in the games.
Page:
Firey Salamander wrote:
> I prefer fantasy type games myself
>
> *girlfriend walks in dressed as a nurse*
>
> er...umm...I...
>
> *faints*
I think you'll love 'Football Strip'. Ha!
> I prefer fantasy type games myself
>
> *girlfriend walks in dressed as a nurse*
>
> er...umm...I...
>
> *faints*
I think you'll love 'Football Strip'. Ha!
I prefer fantasy type games myself
*girlfriend walks in dressed as a nurse*
er...umm...I...
*faints*
*girlfriend walks in dressed as a nurse*
er...umm...I...
*faints*
I think maybe what he meant, and I may be wrong, but this is one way I see it, is that you get the same weapons consistently appearing in most realistic FPS', and are able to relate to them between the games.
Like in DoD you get a Thompson SMG, and also in BF. You sort of know where you stand with one, even if you haven't played the game before.
Like in DoD you get a Thompson SMG, and also in BF. You sort of know where you stand with one, even if you haven't played the game before.
Der Nazi wrote:
> I've always preferred Real-Life FPS- you get to use real weapons,
> unlike plasma guns and lightning guns. and te fact is, you can relate
> to it in reality.
But it's not like you actually are going to run amock with a gun anyway, so if it's unrealistic as it is, why not make it more unrealistic.
> I've always preferred Real-Life FPS- you get to use real weapons,
> unlike plasma guns and lightning guns. and te fact is, you can relate
> to it in reality.
But it's not like you actually are going to run amock with a gun anyway, so if it's unrealistic as it is, why not make it more unrealistic.
Yea didnt really like the First UT but then i found a mod so i played that instead.
Maybe it'll be the same for UT2003, but i want to blag a copy of BF1942 :\
Maybe it'll be the same for UT2003, but i want to blag a copy of BF1942 :\
I've always preferred Real-Life FPS- you get to use real weapons, unlike plasma guns and lightning guns. and te fact is, you can relate to it in reality.
Most popular, downloaded mod since CS.. www.desertcombat.com
What is this desert combat thing? I've heard of it, and it seems to be big, but what's special about it?
I got unreal Tourny 2003... but haven't touched it cos my pc isn't good enuff yet.
I've been looking into selling it for a copy of Battlefield to play Desert Combat mod... looks so sweet.
But then there will be mods for unreal tourny 2003 aswell :|
I've been looking into selling it for a copy of Battlefield to play Desert Combat mod... looks so sweet.
But then there will be mods for unreal tourny 2003 aswell :|
I generally prefer more real life ones, but I like (Tribes and) Tribes II alot.
Page: