The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Thier prefere C&C, which I think is a awfull game in all ways. You really have no major control over your armies in battles like warcraft and you can build super weapons to kill someone off without building a army.
I am wondering which you think is better between the two.
C&C
or
Warcraft
When you voted could you give reasons why
Its the most skilled.
C&C = No support. unbalanced. bad. and... yea :)
Just seen a video of that Rome: Total War - It looks fackin amazing.
And that Lord Of the Rings RTS....
Gives me an excuse to get rid of the god-awful sparkle piece of crap that SR fobbed me off with.
> cipro wrote:
> Speaking of which, do you watch a show called Time Commanders? It's
> a
> game show where a team of people have to cammand armies in
> historical
> battles, but here's the thing, I'm sure the show uses Rome: Total
> War
> to recreate these battles, and if that's the case then it's looking
> very good indeed.
>
> No. What channel/when is it on?
It was on Thursadays on BBC 2, but I think it's now changed to Mondays, same channel but it's on around 6.45 pm.
Last week they had the elephant units on, they looked great, charged into a group of pikemen and started to throw them up in the air. In fact the graphics are amazing, animation is superb and the battle look as frantic and bloody and Shogun and Medieval combined.