Viewing Thread:
"The bad things about GameCube"

I've been reading through a load of issues of N64 Mag and other stuff and my own knmowledge of GameCube to make up a list of GameCubes bad points.

1. It's purple. T.V's are always black or silver. Not a nice combination.

2. The infrared controller without a wire, the one they call Wavebird is great to use, untilyour dog goes and sits right in front of the console!

3. It's too small. What do I fill the gap in my cabinet with?

4. err.....

5. hmmm...

i don't know, but it's probably just hype! unless anyone can prove otherwise?
slik ~_~

i read in the SR mag that G-cube can do 6-12 million porygons 1 second or something and the X-box can do 200 million, is this true?

for your information i am educated, just because i read NOM does'nt mean i'm not! i apologise for any comments that i have posted in the past which you see to be childish, but i don't think iv'e been posting anything which would be considered to be childish lately, and i won't post anything childish again.
And i'm also sorry if you think that reading NOM is wrong, but it's my choice which magazines i read and it's your choice which you read, why we can't just respect each others decisions once in a while i don't know, but is'nt you saying that NOM is a steaming pile of cack childish?
i'm not trying to start another arguement i'm just trying to set the record straight that i am not what you deem to be "childish" any more and that i read NOM because it is my personal choice of magazine, i might convert to another magazine if NOM does'nt get any better by the time the gamecubes released or sooner but that is MY choice, and anything that anyone says can't really convert me but for the meantime, can't we at least respect each others choice of magazine? because if we can't do that then what can we do?
slik ?_?

TILTAWHIRL wrote:
> slik wrote:
> DeltaJava wrote:
> Slik, you are sucking up to
> TBN badly.

No
> i'm not, i was just agreeing with him that
> Owl is being childish!
> don't YOU think he's being
> childish?
slik ?_?

Judging by some of your posts youv'e been
> preety childish, the only reason your saying this is cause you chat
> crap as well.

Thanks for that. You don't read NOM, by any chance? If you do, you must learn one thing in life: and that is to get educated.

slik wrote:
> DeltaJava wrote:
> Slik, you are sucking up to TBN badly.

No
> i'm not, i was just agreeing with him that Owl is being childish!
> don't YOU think he's being childish?
slik ?_?

Yes, I suppose that's true.

Neither is Edge. In fact, I'm sure that Edge is too complicated a mag for these NOM sucking newbies to read...

I remember when Nintendo said the GBA had a 32bit proccessor.

NOM immediately started telling it's readers that it was more powerful than the playstation.
The silly twits.

If anyone ever wonders why there's so many dim newbies in this forum then it's NOM to blame.
The Official Sony Mag might be as biased but it's certainly not as stupid!

slik wrote:
> DeltaJava wrote:
> Slik, you are sucking up to TBN badly.

No
> i'm not, i was just agreeing with him that Owl is being childish!
> don't YOU think he's being childish?
slik ?_?

Judging by some of your posts youv'e been preety childish, the only reason your saying this is cause you chat crap as well.

what bad things? lets talk about the good things!
slik !_?

DeltaJava wrote:
> Slik, you are sucking up to TBN badly.

No i'm not, i was just agreeing with him that Owl is being childish! don't YOU think he's being childish?
slik ?_?