The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Games makers need to start getting more original ideas, or at least put soem serious ideas into sequels, instead of this rubbish which is just a slight tweaking, rather than a vastly improved game.
Get you act together games makers! or sony will have Tomb Raider 7 and Tekken 8 as new games!
> Game sequels are meant to be improved versions of the >game, not just having a number put on the end or having >the number made bigger! Take Gran Turismo 3 for instance >Gran Turismo 3 has 150 cars? What a joke! This should be >called FAST TURISMO! The whole idea of a sequel is to >improve on past games, hence it should have more cars(Not >less!), more manufacturers, more tracks.
GT3 has about 160 cars. Cars in GT3 took 2 weeks to make,cars in GT1 and 2 took 1 day to make. It would have to over 2200 hours to make the cars in GT3 while about 600 hours for GT2.
GT3 has better A.I, better handling, and more or about the same number of courses. There a new courses, the Oil Change, wet weather racing. Loads of race championships to win e.t.c. The problem with GT1 and 2 is that they had about 10 variants for some of the cars, the only difference was the engine size. There are are only the 160 cars but they are all different not like with GT1 and 2. I know there is some cars that arent in GT3 that were in GT2 that should be in but GT3 IMO is a sequel. As GT3 offers the RUF cars instead of them being on old style Porsches they now include, the brand new 911 and Boxster.
> cars. Cars in GT3 took 2 weeks to make,cars in GT1 and 2 took 1 day
> to make. It would have to over 2200 hours to make the cars in GT3
> while about 600 hours for GT2.
That is not the point. They shouldnt make the game less than it could be just because it takes too long. If they want the game to sell more the sequels should be bigger than the one before.
I can understand that size matters in an RPG or something. Final Fantasy is big, and thats really good, however, they don`t make it so big that they sacrifice quality.
More cars or more tacks doesnt mean that a sequel is better. GT3 is a sequel becuase its such an improvement visiually and physically. The PS2 is capable of calculating much more physical calculations than PS1.
It would be nice to have all of the cars from GT2 in the game so the total is 600 but it would take 8400 days to make. So if 1 man worked on them it would take over 23 years. A team of 25 people could make the cars in just under a year.
GT3 includes better Rally racing, F1 cars, wet weather racing e.t.c. It looks and feels better than any other racing game. When you modify your car it will sound and handle different. When you lower the cars suspension e.t.c it will make a difference in the handling. All of these features make GT3 better than the previous games.
The number of cars maybe a disapointment for some but the cars are the best ones. You do find the cheap budget cars that start you off but you get some nice motors that you wouldnt get to drive normally. Having 10 variations of one model of car in GT1 and 2 isnt that good. When you look at GT2 and take the 600 cars alot of these will be the same but have a different number of doors or its from a previous year. The only difference between them is 5kg or one can be turned 10 BHP more than the other. To me this isnt a different car its just a different spec. GT3 gets rid of this which to me is a good thing, if I was going to get a R34 Skyline I would only get the best and not the 2nd to best.