The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If you knew you would get away with it as far as with regards to law and you'd only have to live with your conscience, would you…
1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
Page:
If you knew you would get away with it as far as with regards to law and you'd only have to live with your conscience, would you…
1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
Wouldn't do Number 1.
Number 2 wouldn't bother me in the slightest.
Number 3 would take some consideration.
Number 2 wouldn't bother me in the slightest.
Number 3 would take some consideration.
1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
Wouldn't do that
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
Haven't got a problem with doing that
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
Think this is one of those ones where you would have to say who i had to kill, as if i got to pick then i probably wouldn't have a problem with it.
Wouldn't do that
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
Haven't got a problem with doing that
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
Think this is one of those ones where you would have to say who i had to kill, as if i got to pick then i probably wouldn't have a problem with it.
1-no way
2-yes way
3-maybe
2-yes way
3-maybe
So far it seems that the first is a no-no, probably due to it being a person seen as vulnerable.
The second one a yes due to it being a face-less moneymaking machine.
The third a maybe just because of the amount of money offered.
The second one a yes due to it being a face-less moneymaking machine.
The third a maybe just because of the amount of money offered.
The third falls into 'consideration' territory for me as it depends on who the victim is and also how much I actually needed the money.
If it was a person of my choice, I'd do it and just go for someone like a bum or something, somebody no-one's going to miss. If it was someone I knew but didn't love/care about, I'd have to determine if I'm really in need of the money as I couldn't do it just for greed. I definitely wouldn't do it if it was a loved one/someone close to me.
If it was a person of my choice, I'd do it and just go for someone like a bum or something, somebody no-one's going to miss. If it was someone I knew but didn't love/care about, I'd have to determine if I'm really in need of the money as I couldn't do it just for greed. I definitely wouldn't do it if it was a loved one/someone close to me.
What if it was someone you'd never met before, however he was a family man?
Well, I've got to go to work now. I'd kill just about any one of you not to go though.
That would go into the middle section - Do I really need the money? Am I that desperate I'd kill someone for a break?
Like I said first, if it was someone I didn't know, but of my choice, I'd choose someone who won't be missed by anyone.
If I didn't have a choice, the decision would be much easier to make.
Like I said first, if it was someone I didn't know, but of my choice, I'd choose someone who won't be missed by anyone.
If I didn't have a choice, the decision would be much easier to make.
£100 off an old person, JUST A MEASLY £100?!! if he had much more then maybe consider it, but not for £100.
Could never kill anyone so strike 3.
Therefore it looks like robbing the bank is the only real alternative, just like the Lib Dems.
Could never kill anyone so strike 3.
Therefore it looks like robbing the bank is the only real alternative, just like the Lib Dems.
Page: