Viewing Thread:
"Charles and Camilla"

What about all the carry on about this wedding? is it legal or is it not? or do we really care? sould the Queen attend or not? and the Prime minister is reported as being upset that he has not yet had an invite, what do others think?

What about all the carry on about this wedding? is it legal or is it not? or do we really care? sould the Queen attend or not? and the Prime minister is reported as being upset that he has not yet had an invite, what do others think?

if they concieve i'm going to be sick.

plus, the idea is to marry outiside the same gene pool BEFORE you have the kids.

Do we get a day off?

I've yet to meet a person who gives a toss.

I fail to find any interest in this subject.

+ The Royal Family are pointless in my opinion, I mean, what exactly do they do?

Isn't meant to offend the pro-Royal groups amongst us

I think the amount of drinking, drug-taking, scrounging off the tax-payer, and general abuse of their positions makes them perfect figureheads for our country.

Also, Camilla and Diana were both "fluffers" in royal circles, weren't they?

monkey_man wrote:
> Also, Camilla and Diana were both "fluffers" in royal
> circles, weren't they?

Having recently been told that "fluffing" is another word for farting, I think we both look upon that sentence in greatly different ways.

I can imagine them in the Royal lift and poor old Charles having to take the blame.

The way I understand it, they were no more than high-class prostitutes.

Shocked me today reading FHM, (first time I've ever read one despite having bought about 30 when I was 12-14), how many women will do just that for things.

gamesfreak wrote:
> The Royal Family are pointless in my opinion, I mean, what exactly do they do?

I'm not pro-Royal at all but they do bring in a hell of a lot of tourism and tourism = money.