Viewing Thread:
"I said the Superbowl was the most boring thing I'd see for a while"

Oh, no, wait - I just watched England v Dutchland.

What a boring game. And why on earth didn't Sven give the young'uns a chance? And when he did, why the hell did he play them out of position?
Deary me.

So yeah, wasn't much to write home about.
A friendly, granted, but surely that's when teams should be trying risky play? Oh well.

I was at Lakeside the other week and there was a Superbowl team doing a show type thing. They picked people ou of the crowd and they had to dance like idiots infront of everyone and at the end they won a 'Superbowl watch'.

The only reason why everyone was wathing it was because of the cheerleaders.

No, I'm just pretending I know what you're talking about when I haven't a clue.

Ahah, Azul's in gay boy mode.

Aha yeah, that Sapp. What a guy!

...

The same Sapp who did absolutely nothing this year? Don't think we missed him flapping his gums that much :-D

Anyway surprised the Raiders have a team to put out next season, they're all picking up their pension aren't they? :-D

30-20, wasn't it? Plus, we stole your Sapp.

Ahaha.

AfroJoe wrote:
> It's going to be a Bucs-only rule, Lakers. Gives them 7 downs when in
> the redzone, so maybe they'll score an offensive touchdown this year.
> :-)


is that the same Bucs who had the same record as your cheating dirty Raiders AJ? :-D

AfroJoe wrote:
> maybe they'll score an offensive touchdown this year.
> :-)

Ahahaha yeah, maybe!

...

It's going to be a Bucs-only rule, Lakers. Gives them 7 downs when in the redzone, so maybe they'll score an offensive touchdown this year. :-)

hehe must be a new rule they're implementing next year :-D