Viewing Thread:
"Reviewing Lame Reviews - A Game"

Many a times, we come across some reviews on SRDN that are a lame GAD attempt. I start to laugh my hea on it, and want to share my comments with others. So, I have started this thread. Anyone will post a review from ukreviews.com (I hope that does not infringe copyrights), and the others will post their comments on it, as to where it gets boring, and where does it seem that they are mere GAD attempts & not good reviews.

This thread is quite crap.

No critics over here then, eh?

No critics over here thewn, eh?

I am criticiing because that was just a lame attempt on my part. Anyways, whatever paert I've criticized was a patchwork by me; and I regret that.

So why are you criticising your own reviews?
Oh because you didn't write a single word of them!

Xenophon wrote:
> do you think there is a single review here not aimed at GAD???
> thats the whole point of it!!

Most of the time I write reviews just for the sake of it. Sometimes I will to win games, but I enjoy it, so it's win-win.

And seeing as how she has breasts and all

The Winster wrote:
> English_Bloke wrote:
> Put more gaps in your reviews, woman!
>
> Whome are you reffering to when you say "Woman"?

Im guessing that would be me seeing as it was after my post.

The Winster Reviewed: -
Back in the platform era, on every generation of home consoles - Sega witnessed defeat at the hands of Nintendo, and their battles remind you of the epic struggles between EA's Fifa & Konami's PES to get the hold of the best football sim title.

Don't you remember that the battles between Sega & Nintendo were before in time than those between EA & Konami. So how is the former suppose to remind you of the latter?

Er, You all missed the concept. The fun is right, but you need to criticize the review; even if it ddoesn't need it. Do it like that