The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
First of all, the majority of all votes went in his favour.
But then, the greater percentage edged over to 'No'.
And now.... Sorry, I don't know!
But, I did "waste" 25p+ on a text message voting in favour of a new spot-kick taker. Someone more accustomed to goal-scoring and driving the ball down the middle - much like Alan Shearer - rather than going for poncey old placement.
To tell you the truth, I've never really understood why he was chosen for any reason other than for the 'BS' and hype Sven-Goran Eriksson buys into, anyway! His free-kicks may be immaculate and he is captain, but does that
make him the ideal choice as "fans' favourite"?
I can't think of a single time he took on for Man. United OUTSIDE of a Charity Shield game. There was that one-time while he was on-loan at Preston a decade ago, and then there was that "Jonny Wilkinson" against Turkey - that's all I can recall before France.
Paul Scholes can really hit them. Michael Owen's our No.1 for finishing. When playing, Frank Lampard's had a 100% record for Chelsea this past season. I'm sure Steven Gerard could do the right thing when called upon. Wayne Rooney's fast-becoming everybody's favourite, and I'm sure even David James would know exactly where to put the ball...
I'm after your opinions on this matter, please. And, at 'no-price-to-pay', I'm after more than just a simple 'Yes' or 'No' answer, thanks.
Should David Beckham still be taking penalty kicks for England?
If not, who would you choose and why?
-----
Also, their are two opinions (as ever in these big games) as to what 'that' actually was.
In your opinion, was it a good save from Fabien Barthez, or, simply, a crap penalty from David Beckham?
As arrogant Englishman who are likely to stand behind their nonced-up Pop Idolic leader, I'd expect the major part of this country to be applauding "Broken-Nose" Barthez for his heroics, whatever the final result.
What do YOU think?
> I dont think beckham should take our penalties. He always looks
> uncertain, remember Vs argentina he muffed the ball straight
> down the middle but was lucky to get the goal. Always, Vs
> Turkey he tripped up and skied the ball miles over, and now,
> vs France he obviously went for "poncy placement"
> with no power. I reckon someone like owen should take the penalties
> as he is better coping with pressure, and if he misses, he wont get
> as much media bombardment than if beck's had missed. So no, Beckham
> should not take our penalties. who should we trust to take it then? that is the question..........
> DW wrote:
> I used to be anti-David...by the way.
>
> You're one of his mistresses aren't you?
Well, people do call me Rebecca...
> I used to be anti-David...by the way.
You're one of his mistresses aren't you?
Beckham has taken nine penalties for England, right?
Scored :: 7
On Target :: 8
Missed :: 2
Off Target :: 1
He misses a penalty and everyone jumps down his throat. Perhaps it was in fact a good save, yet still a good penalty.
I used to be anti-David...by the way.
> I think Owen should take them
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHA AHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
i would rather Ian walker took them with a blindfold on and his legs tied together.