The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Which of these is better: Star Trek Voyager Elite Force, Enemy Engaged, Warrior Kings or Ford Racing 2001 ?
Page:
Which of these is better: Star Trek Voyager Elite Force, Enemy Engaged, Warrior Kings or Ford Racing 2001 ?
How can you compare a 1st person shooter with an F1 game?
You're stupid.
You're stupid.
Ford have a team in F1?
You're stupid.
*Ahem*
You're stupid.
*Ahem*
Sex.
That was pretty sick, Hedfix.
Azul wrote:
> Ford have a team in F1?
>
> You're stupid.
> *Ahem*
*******
I suffer from selective dyslesxia, I just saw the F in Ford and the 1 in 2001.
Timmargh's fault, it's his side of the brain. (And just to make you weep even more) and I was daydreaming about Borat...
> Ford have a team in F1?
>
> You're stupid.
> *Ahem*
*******
I suffer from selective dyslesxia, I just saw the F in Ford and the 1 in 2001.
Timmargh's fault, it's his side of the brain. (And just to make you weep even more) and I was daydreaming about Borat...
Excuse me while I find a chair and some sturdy rope.
Mav wrote:
> That was pretty sick, Hedfix.
Heh, why exactly?
> That was pretty sick, Hedfix.
Heh, why exactly?
Silent Death wrote:
> Which of these is better: Star Trek Voyager Elite Force, Enemy
> Engaged, Warrior Kings or Ford Racing 2001 ?
All crap!
> Which of these is better: Star Trek Voyager Elite Force, Enemy
> Engaged, Warrior Kings or Ford Racing 2001 ?
All crap!
Hedfix wrote:
> Mav wrote:
> That was pretty sick, Hedfix.
>
> Heh, why exactly?
He's looking at a Star Trek game.
You shouldn't taunt people like that. It's just not fair.
> Mav wrote:
> That was pretty sick, Hedfix.
>
> Heh, why exactly?
He's looking at a Star Trek game.
You shouldn't taunt people like that. It's just not fair.
Page: