Old films, new format.
Freeola Internet Get Dotted Domains Gaming & Extras
Freeola Gameaday
VIP Unlimited Hosting
 
Browse Chat Forums:
 Chat Forums Home Latest Message Chat Rules Chat Safety & Tips Top Posters How to Win GAD Awards View the Winners List Update Your Profile See Who's Online
  Free Web Site  Free Domain Hosting  Emergency Internet  Broadband Offers
 

Premium Customer Support

Win FREE Games!

Visit our Support Pages E-mail a Support Request Contact Us

Free email address: ukswingers.net!

nothing
You Are Here Chat Home (84) Internet  General Chat  "Old films, new forma..."
Just lurking around? Why not join in? You could win free games just by chatting. Choose your Nickname in MyFreeola or Sign Up Here.
 
 
Browsing the Freeola Chat Forums...
 
After the original message, all posts and replies are shown in reverse order, with the most recent post at the top. i.e. your latest post will always appear under the original message, at the top of the first page.
 
To display oldest posts first, click 'Flip Order - Oldest First' above.
Close This Tip
Old films, new format.
"Spoooooon!"
Moderator
on 02/08/2007 at 10:25:44PM
Total Posts: 7731
Original Post:
Ok, so they haven´t quite taken over DVD yet, but the high definition video formats, Blu Ray in particular, seem to be selling pretty well now.

It´s a great improvement when you watch the latest movie or CGI animation on these formats, the source can be directly used for the highest definition picture and sound and in some cases, as with Superman Returns, a High Def camera is used in the filming.

But what concerns me is the wealth of older titles appearing on these formats.  While it´s understandable to have current films available and it was certainly beneficial to have these on DVD, will films made 20 years ago or more benefit from high def discs?

Classics will still sell, mainly to people who don´t have a copy on DVD already, and some will have added features to use the disc space, but films such as Blazing Saddles, while excellent, just don´t really show any difference between the DVD and High def disc, yet they cost more on the new format.

Is this another attempt to fleece money from people for the same old titles, or is it a need to show a huge back catalogue to tempt people to the new formats?  Either way, it should really only be allowed if there are enough extras to add to the package, such as interactive picture-in-picture commentaries or new documentaries not found on the DVD release.

With the advent of upscaling on DVDs you even get a better (if not quite High Def) picture from your old discs on HD TVs.  Another arguement against the old films appearing on High Def discs without added extras.

For now, I´m sticking to new films on Blu-ray and keeping my DVD collection for everything else.
Back To Threads Post a Reply  
   Delicious   Digg   Reddit      StumbleUpon
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 Replies:
Geffdof
"lets go back"
Regular
on 15/08/2007 at 12:54:05PM
Total Posts: 912
I think its pointless to buy HD versions of films that are filmed in low-def. Just buy a cheap DVD and use an upscaling DVD player. There are some old films such as Terminator 2 (it seems odd saying thats old) that were filmed in HD originally so a Blu-Ray/HD-DVD of that would of course provide increased picture quality. The studios realise that people are stupid though and thats why they release old stuff on the new format.
pb
"Spoooooon!"
Moderator
on 13/08/2007 at 2:52:20PM
Total Posts: 7731
Not sure if that's true.  It certainly sped up the introduction, but as more High Def TVs are sold, people will look for something to use them with and that's where the standalone players will come in, especially for those who don't want a games machine. 

As a whole, both the formats offer some exceptional pictures and some great extras that are not technically possible on DVD, I can see them eventually replacing DVD, but it won't be as fast as the last generation as the technology isn't as radically different.
Ninja_Reborn
""none""
Regular
on 11/08/2007 at 4:27:50PM
Total Posts: 327
No one would have ever noticed blu-ray if it wasn't for the PS3, that was the debut of it.
Your Honour
Regular
on 10/08/2007 at 11:25:44AM
Total Posts: 666
It's another opportunity for companies to fleece the public.

Just wait for another 17 different Star Wars box sets.
pb
"Spoooooon!"
Moderator
on 07/08/2007 at 10:36:09PM
Total Posts: 7731
CDs didn´t also play tapes at higher quality, neither did DVD play videos.  The quality leap isn´t that easy to see between DVD and High Def either.

The main issue is that CD was a new format with new abilities, so was DVD.  Practically all films were enhanced by it, not so with High Def formats for some older films where there is little or no distinction between the DVD and High def formats, both of which can be played in the same machines.
Garin
"Devil in disguise"
Regular
on 05/08/2007 at 2:44:52AM
Total Posts: 1737
Not sure what it is you expect really.  When CDs first came out, did you believe that record labels shouldnt release their back catalogs unless they included extra tracks too? 
Of course old stuff is going to be released on Blu-Ray/HD-DVD.  The HD formats arent a complement to DVD, they are a replacement.  People are never going to be encouraged to make the jump unless ultimately they are going to have access to the same range as DVD.
pb
"Spoooooon!"
Moderator
on 02/08/2007 at 10:25:44PM
Total Posts: 7731
Ok, so they haven´t quite taken over DVD yet, but the high definition video formats, Blu Ray in particular, seem to be selling pretty well now.

It´s a great improvement when you watch the latest movie or CGI animation on these formats, the source can be directly used for the highest definition picture and sound and in some cases, as with Superman Returns, a High Def camera is used in the filming.

But what concerns me is the wealth of older titles appearing on these formats.  While it´s understandable to have current films available and it was certainly beneficial to have these on DVD, will films made 20 years ago or more benefit from high def discs?

Classics will still sell, mainly to people who don´t have a copy on DVD already, and some will have added features to use the disc space, but films such as Blazing Saddles, while excellent, just don´t really show any difference between the DVD and High def disc, yet they cost more on the new format.

Is this another attempt to fleece money from people for the same old titles, or is it a need to show a huge back catalogue to tempt people to the new formats?  Either way, it should really only be allowed if there are enough extras to add to the package, such as interactive picture-in-picture commentaries or new documentaries not found on the DVD release.

With the advent of upscaling on DVDs you even get a better (if not quite High Def) picture from your old discs on HD TVs.  Another arguement against the old films appearing on High Def discs without added extras.

For now, I´m sticking to new films on Blu-ray and keeping my DVD collection for everything else.
 
Change Chat Area
 
Your Details MyFreeola Internet Settings Control Panel Your Details
Login or create a free account.
Forgotten your password?
Free Account Sign-Up
 
 
Fantastic FREE Unlimited Services for every freeola internet customer in the UK!
Register Domain Names. Buy from £2.99
e.g. yourcompany.com
or just yourcompany.
MORE ABOUT DOMAIN NAMES