I was talking about me as much as I was talking about you.

Doofus.

Vergil wrote:
> Although, I thought the whole point of these forums was to submit
> stuff, yet when I do, the staffies/mods whatever also have a moan.
> You all need to calm down a bit...take anger management or something.

Ha ha. Grrrr.
Ok, I'll try and calm down if you try and get a sense of humour. Was just a joke directed at your past slight obsession with DMC.

Post on public forums and there's always some smartarse who'll take issue with your opinion. Don't take it so seriously. Doofus.

^{'Doofus' is my word of the day.}

Vergil wrote:
> Bonus wrote:
> Vergil wrote:
> It's probably all CGI, but it looks pretty sweet all the same. Even
> if Dante does look a bit demented now!
>
> I'll put one vote in for me actually caring too, just to stick up
> for
> you against the staff ;-).
>
> Hmm, how considerate when all you do is moan about me. ¬_¬

I didn't realise posting in two of your topics as accumulating to all I do turns out to be moaning at you.

> So why is it that people call fmv's cgi, rather than in game clips?

Quite easy because they're not and never have been rendered in the game engine but more likely rendered in an animation package.

> I know what I'm on about, so please, just hush. I put this on as a
> favour to you lot, but I knew you'd be the first to have a
> go....seeing as you can't accept it when you are wrong and all.

I haven't said anythign that's wrong, and if you're not interested in it anyway why bother retorting and just leave it for people who don't know there is a difference between scripted/pre-set animation and actual physical simulation.

> Now please stop making all of my topics into some sort of spam topic
> by causing/provoking arguements...appreciated.

I'm not trying to provoke arguements, all I did was point out that these clips might not be indicative of the final performace of the PS3 as they are animation sequences and not actual gameplay footage.

> Although, I thought the whole point of these forums was to submit
> stuff, yet when I do, the staffies/mods whatever also have a moan.
> You all need to calm down a bit...take anger management or something.
> ¬_¬

Same to you, I didn't see anything in this thread looking even remotely annoyed or threatened until I got to your last post.

Vergil wrote:
> It's probably all CGI, but it looks pretty sweet all the same. Even
> if Dante does look a bit demented now!

Dunno if you are starting to lose your way a bit.  All games would be CGI as they are computer games.

The question is if it is being rendered at a real-time frame rate or not.

For instance Monsters Inc frames took 4-9 minutes each to render and as they aren't being rendered at a rate of 60 a second, they look much mroe detailed as the developers can do more.  CGI films and games are now both done using shaders, all that matters these days is frame rate.

I'm guessing it is real-time renderes, but scripted or pre-animated not actually game code running based on physics or AI simulations.  This is especially important when looking at Dante's coat.  Is it a physical cloth dynamic simulation or is it just animated and not actually using up very much processing power.  All we can do is wait and see.

I'll put one vote in for me actually caring too, just to stick up for you against the staff ;-).

Like anyone cares other than you... ;)